یکی از خصوصیات فرد متکبر : عجز و ناتوانی آدم حقیر و عقده ائی که خودشو یه دفعه در داشتن رقت آور سهمی در قدرت شریک میبینه
پیمان پایدار
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
www.youtube.com دو بار به کوبا سفر کرده ام .اولین بار سال 1994(از طریق مکزیک) با یار پروئی قبلیم و بار دوم سال 2000 ,به تنهائی(از مونترال کانادا).هر بار واسه دو هفته.عاشق مردم این جزیره هستم....شور زندگی در تک تک شون جوانه زده و قابل تقدیره!زنده باد کوبای مستقل!مرگ بر امپریالیسم آمریکا,بلای جون کوبائی ها.زنده باد آنارشی, طبعا برای کوبا نیز
Danay Suarez Yo Aprendi CD: Polvo de la Humedad Dirrection: Willberg H. Monterde Fotographia: Viktor Rising Edition: Reinaldo Chewere, Charles Cabrera http:/...
هرچند با آنارشیسم فردگرایانه خط کشی کامل دارم, چرا که واسه من آنارشیسم - کمونیستی یا همان سوسیالیسم آزادیخواهانه رهنمود راه آزادی بشریت میباشد, در اینجا واسه رفقای علاقه مند بخوندن و گسترش معرفت در این زمینه صفحه "بنجامین تاکر" را میگذارم تا از آن استفاده بهینه ببرند
نابود باد سرمایه داری-مرگ بر دین-مرگ بر دولت
زنده بد آنارشی
پیمان پایدار
libertarian-labyrinth.org
Welcome to The Liberty Site,an archive of Benjamin R. Tucker's Liberty, which was the most prominent periodical of individualist anarchism in the years 1881-1908, and probably of any period. You can find all 403 issues of Liberty and the 8 issues of the German-language Libertas in pdf form.
| |||||||||
Ten Steps for Radical Revolution in the US
*****************************
Introduction~Even though the following text is not based on the revolutionary philosophy of Anarchism,it's not proposing the abolishment of the State & uprooting /erradication of Capitalism,but its way better than the super reactionary status quo in the U.S of A .That's why I reprint it here for the reader's information~PaYmaN PieDaR
***************************
***************************
By Bill Quigley, 24Jan2012, Center for Constitutional Rights and a law professor at Loyola University New Orleans
I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. ~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. 1967
I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. ~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. 1967
- One. Human rights must be taken absolutely seriously.
Every single person is entitled to dignity and human rights. No application needed. No exclusions at all. This is our highest priority. - Two. We must radically reinvent contemporary democracy. Current systems are deeply corrupt and not responsive to the needs of people.
Representatives chosen by money and influence govern by money and influence. This is unacceptable. Direct democracy by the people is now technologically possible and should be the rule.
Communities must be protected whenever they advocate for self-determination, self-development and human rights. Dissent is essential to democracy; we pledge to help it flourish. - Three. Corporations are not people and are not entitled to human rights.
Amend the US Constitution so it is clear corporations do not have constitutional or human rights. We the people must cut them down to size and so democracy can regulate their size, scope and actions. - Four. Leave the rest of the world alone. Cut US military spending by 75 percent and bring all troops outside the US home now.
Defense of the US is a human right. Global offense and global police force by US military are not. Eliminate all nuclear and chemical and biological weapons. Stop allowing scare tactics to build up the national security forces at home. Stop the myth that the US is somehow special or exceptional and is entitled to act differently than all other nations. The US must re-join the global family of nations as a respectful partner. USA is one of many nations in the world. We must start acting like it. - Five. Property rights, privilege, and money-making are not as important as human rights.
When current property and privilege arrangements are not just they must yield to the demands of human rights. Money-making can only be allowed when human rights are respected. Exploitation is unacceptable.
There are national and global poverty lines. We must establish national and global excess lines so that people and businesses with extra houses, cars, luxuries, and incomes share much more to help everyone else be able to exercise their basic human rights to shelter, food, education and healthcare. If that disrupts current property, privilege and money-making, so be it.
- Six. Defend our earth. Stop pollution, stop pipelines, stop new interstates, and stop destroying the land, sea, and air by extracting resources from them. Rebuild what we have destroyed. If corporations will not stop voluntarily, people must stop them. The very existence of life is at stake.
- Seven. Dramatically expand public spaces and reverse the privatization of public services.
Quality public education, health and safety for all must be provided by transparent accountable public systems. Starving the state is a recipe for destroying social and economic human rights for everyone but the rich. - Eight. Pull the criminal legal prison system up and out by its roots and start over.
Cease the criminalization of drugs, immigrants, poor people and people of color. We are all entitled to be safe but the current system makes us less so and ruins millions of lives. Start over.
- Nine. The US was created based on two original crimes that must be confessed and made right.
Reparations are owed to Native Americans because their land was stolen and they were uprooted and slaughtered.
Reparations are owed to African Americans because they were kidnapped, enslaved and abused. The US has profited widely from these injustices and must make amends. - Ten. Everyone who wants to work should have the right to work and earn a living wage.
Any workers who want to organize and advocate for change in solidarity with others must be absolutely protected from recriminations from their employer and from their government.
Finally, if those in government and those in power do not help the people do what is right, people seeking change must together exercise our human rights and bring about these changes directly.
Dr. King and millions of others lived and worked for a radical revolution of values. We will as well.
We respect the human rights and human dignity of others and work for a world where love and wisdom and solidarity and respect prevail.
We expect those for whom the current unjust system works just fine will object and oppose and accuse people seeking dramatic change of being divisive and worse. That is to be expected because that is what happens to all groups which work for serious social change.
Despite that, people will continue to go forward with determination and purpose to bring about a radical revolution of values in the USA.
_______
About author Bill is legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights and a law professor at Loyola University New Orleans. You can reach him at Quigley77@gmail.com
Dr. King and millions of others lived and worked for a radical revolution of values. We will as well.
We respect the human rights and human dignity of others and work for a world where love and wisdom and solidarity and respect prevail.
We expect those for whom the current unjust system works just fine will object and oppose and accuse people seeking dramatic change of being divisive and worse. That is to be expected because that is what happens to all groups which work for serious social change.
Despite that, people will continue to go forward with determination and purpose to bring about a radical revolution of values in the USA.
_______
About author Bill is legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights and a law professor at Loyola University New Orleans. You can reach him at Quigley77@gmail.com
Photos
It Can't Happen Here
Iranian Aircraft Carriers in the Gulf of Mexico
By Tom Engelhardt
Iranian Aircraft Carriers in the Gulf of Mexico
By Tom Engelhardt
- Satire -
Exclusive: New Iranian Commando Team Operating Near U.S.
(Tehran, FNA) The Fars News Agency has confirmed with the Republican Guard's North American Operations Command that a new elite Iranian commando team is operating in the U.S.-Mexican border region. The primary day-to-day mission of the team, known as the Joint Special Operations Gulf of Mexico Task Force, or JSOG-MTF, is to mentor Mexican military units in the border areas in their war with the deadly drug cartels. The task force provides "highly trained personnel that excel in uncertain environments," Maj. Amir Arastoo, a spokesman for Republican Guard special operations forces in North America, tells Fars, and "seeks to confront irregular threats..."
The unit began its existence in mid-2009 -- around the time that Washington rejected the Iranian leadership's wish for a new diplomatic dialogue. But whatever the task force does about the United States -- or might do in the future -- is a sensitive subject with the Republican Guard. "It would be inappropriate to discuss operational plans regarding any particular nation," Arastoo says about the U.S.
January 30, 2012 "Tom Dispatch" - - Okay, so I made that up. Sue me. But first admit that, a line or two in, you knew it was fiction. After all, despite the talk about American decline, we are still on a one-way imperial planet. Yes, there is a new U.S. special operations team known as Joint Special Operations Task Force-Gulf Cooperation Council, or JSOTF-GCC, at work near Iran and, according to Wired magazine's Danger Room blog, we really don't quite know what it's tasked with doing (other than helping train the forces of such allies as Bahrain and Saudi Arabia).
And yes, the quotes are perfectly real, just out of the mouth of a U.S. "spokesman for special-operations forces in the Mideast," not a representative of Iran's Republican Guard. And yes, most Americans, if they were to read about the existence of the new special ops team, wouldn't think it strange that U.S. forces were edging up to (if not across) the Iranian border, not when our "safety" was at stake.
Reverse the story, though, and it immediately becomes a malign, if unimaginable, fairy tale. Of course, no Iranian elite forces will ever operate along the U.S. border. Not in this world. Washington wouldn't live with it and it remains the military giant of giants on this planet. By comparison, Iran is, in military terms, a minor power.
Any Iranian forces on the Mexican border would represent a crossing of one of those "red lines" that U.S. officials are always talking about and so an international abomination to be dealt with severely. More than that, their presence would undoubtedly be treated as an act of war. It would make screaming headlines here. The Republican candidates for the presidency would go wild. You know the rest. Think about the reaction when Attorney General Eric Holder announced that an Iranian-American used-car salesman from Texas had contacted a Mexican drug cartel as part of a bizarre plot supposedly hatched by senior members of the elite Iranian Quds Force to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in a Washington restaurant and possibly bomb the Saudi and Israeli embassies as well.
Though doubts were soon raised about the likelihood of such an Iranian plot, the outrage in the U.S. was palpable. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton insisted that it "crosses a line that Iran needs to be held to account for." The Wall Street Journal labeled it "arguably an act of war," as did Congressman Peter King, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee. Speaker of the House John Boehner termed it "a very serious breach of international behavior," while House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers swore that it crossed "a very dangerous threshold" and called for "unprecedented" action by the Obama administration.
On the other hand, no one here would claim that a U.S. special operations team edging up to the Iranian border was anything out of the ordinary or that it potentially crossed any lines, red or otherwise, or was a step beyond what the international community accepts. In fact, the news, such as it was, caused no headlines in the press, no comments on editorial pages, nothing. After all, everyone knows that Iranians would be the equivalent of fish out of water in Mexico, but that Americans are at home away from home in the Persian Gulf (as in most other places on Earth).
The Iranian "War" Against America
Nonetheless, just for the heck of it, let's suspend the laws of political and military gravity and pile up a few more fairy-tale-ish details.
Imagine that, in late 2007, Iran's ruling mullahs and their military advisors had decided to upgrade already significant covert activities against Washington, including cross-border operations, and so launched an intensification of its secret campaign to "destabilize" the country's leadership -- call it a covert war if you will -- funded by hundreds of millions of dollars of oil money; that they (or their allies) supported armed oppositional groups hostile to Washington; that they flew advanced robot drones on surveillance missions in the country's airspace; that they imposed ever escalating sanctions, which over the years caused increased suffering among the American people, in order to force Washington to dismantle its nuclear arsenal and give up the nuclear program (military and peaceful) that it had been pursuing since 1943; that they and an ally developed and launched a computer worm meant to destroy American centrifuges and introduced sabotaged parts into its nuclear supply chain; that they encouraged American nuclear scientists to defect; that one of their allies launched an assassination program against American nuclear scientists and engineers, killing five of them on the streets of American cities; that they launched a global campaign to force the world not to buy key American products, including Hollywood movies, iPhones, iPods, and iPads, and weaponry of any sort by essentially embargoing American banking transactions.
Imagine as well that an embattled American president declared the Gulf of Mexico to be off-limits to Iranian aircraft carriers and threatened any entering its waters with dire consequences. In response, the Iranians promptly sent their aircraft carrier, the Mossadegh, and its battle group of accompanying ships directly into Gulf waters not far from Florida and then stationed a second carrier, the Khomeini, and its task force in the nearby Caribbean as support. (Okay, the Iranians don't have aircraft carriers, but just for a moment, suspend disbelief.)
And keep in mind that, in this outlandish scenario, all of the above would only be what we knew about or suspected. You would have to assume that there were also still-unknown aspects to their in-the-shadows campaign of regime change against Washington.
Now, pinned to Iran, that list looks absurd. Were such things to have happened (even in a far more limited fashion), they would have been seen across the American political spectrum as an abomination (and rightly so), a morass of illegal, illegitimate, and immoral acts and programs that would have to be opposed at all costs. As you also know perfectly well, it is a description of just what we do know or suspect that the U.S. has done, alone or in concert with its ally Israel, or what, in the case of the assassination operations against nuclear scientists (and possibly an explosion that destroyed much of an Iranian missile base, killing a major general and 16 others), Israel has evidently done on its own, but possibly with the covert agreement of Washington.
And yet you can search the mainstream news far and wide without seeing words like "illegal," "illegitimate," or "immoral" or even "a very serious breach of international behavior" applied to them, though you can certainly find sunny reports on our potential power to loose destruction in the region, the sorts of articles that, if they were in the state-controlled Iranian press, we would consider propaganda.
While the other three presidential candidates were baying for Iranian blood at a recent Republican debate, it was left to Ron Paul, the ultimate outsider, to point out the obvious: that the latest round of oil sanctions being imposed by Washington and just agreed to by the European Union, meant to prohibit the sale of Iranian oil on the international market, was essentially an "act of war," and that it preceded recent Iranian threats (an unlikely prospect, by the way) to close the Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the planet's oil flows.
And keep in mind, the covert war against Iran is ostensibly aimed at a nuclear weapon that does not exist, that the country's leaders claim they are not building, that the best work of the American intelligence community in 2007 and 2010 indicated was not yet on the horizon. (At the moment, at worst, the Iranians are believed to be working toward "possible breakout capacity" -- that is, the ability to relatively "quickly" build a nuclear weapon, if the decision were made.) As for nuclear weapons, we have 5,113 warheads that we don't doubt are necessary for our safety and the safety of the planet. These are weapons that we implicitly trust ourselves to have, even though the United States remains the only country ever to use nuclear weapons, obliterating two Japanese cities at the cost of perhaps 200,000 civilian deaths. Similarly, we have no doubt that the world is safe with Israel possessing up to 200 nuclear weapons, a near civilization-destroying (undeclared) arsenal. But it is our conviction that an Iranian bomb, even one, would end life as we know it.
Added to that fear is the oft-cited fact that Iran is run by a mullahtariat that oppresses any opposition. That, however, only puts it in league with U.S. allies in the region like Bahrain, whose monarchy has shot down, beaten up, and jailed its opposition, and the Saudis, who have fiercely repressed their own dissidents. Nor, in terms of harm to its people, is Iran faintly in a league with past U.S. allies like General Augusto Pinochet of Chile, who launched a U.S.-backed military coup against a democratically elected government on September 11, 1973, killing more than died in the 9/11 attacks of 2001, or the Indonesian autocrat Suharto on whom the deaths of at least half a million of his people are usually pinned.
Washington At Home in the World
Here, then, is a little necessary context for the latest round of Iran-mania in the U.S.: Washington has declared the world its oyster and garrisons the planet in a historically unique way -- without direct colonies but with approximately 1,000 bases worldwide (not including those in war zones or ones the Pentagon prefers not to acknowledge). That we do so, unique as it may be in the records of empire, strikes us as anything but odd and so is little discussed here. One of the reasons is simple enough. What's called our "safety" and "security" has been made a planetary issue. It is, in fact, the planetary standard for action, though one only we (or our closest allies) can invoke. Others are held to far more limiting rules of behavior.
As a result, a U.S. president can now send drones and special operations forces just about anywhere to kill just about anyone he designates as a threat to our security. Since we are everywhere, and everywhere at home, and everywhere have "interests," we may indeed be threatened anywhere. Wherever we've settled in -- and in the Persian Gulf, as an example, we're deeply entrenched -- new "red lines" have been created that others are prohibited from crossing. No one, after all, can infringe on our safety.
In support of our interests -- which, speaking truthfully, are also the interests of oil -- we could covertly overthrow an Iranian government in 1953 (starting the whole train of events that led to this crisis moment in the Persian Gulf), and we can again work to overthrow an Iranian government in 2012. The only issue seriously discussed in this country is: How exactly can we do it, or can we do it at all (without causing ourselves irreparably greater harm)? Effectiveness, not legality or morality, is the only measurement. Few in our world (and who else matters?) question our right to do so, though obviously the right of any other state to do something similar to us or one of our allies, or to retaliate or even to threaten to retaliate, should we do so, is considered shocking and beyond all norms, beyond every red line when it comes to how nations (except us) should behave.
This mindset, and the acts that have gone with it, have blown what is, at worst, a modest-sized global problem up into an existential threat, a life-and-death matter. Iran as a global monster now nearly fills what screen-space there is for foreign enemies in the present American moment. Yet, despite its enormous energy reserves, it is a shaky regional power, ruled by a faction-ridden set of fundamentalists (but not madmen), the most hardline of whom seem at the moment ascendant (in no small part due to American and Israeli policies). The country has a relatively modest military budget, and no recent history of invading other states. It has been under intense pressure of every sort for years now and the strains are showing. The kind of pressure the U.S. and its allies have been exerting creates the basis for madness -- or for terrible miscalculation followed by inevitable tragedy.
In an election year in the U.S., little of this is apparent. The Republicans, Ron Paul aside, have made Iran the entrée du jour on the American (and Israeli) security menu, a situation that couldn't be more absurdly out of proportion or more dangerous. In fact, when it comes to "American security," our fundamentalists are off on another rampage with the Obama administration following behind.
Just as a small exercise to restore some sense of proportion, stop for a moment the next time you hear of American or Israeli plans for the further destabilization of Iran and think: what would we do if the Iranians were planning something similar for us?
It's one small way to begin, individually, to imagine a planet on which everyone might experience some sense of security. And here's the oddest thing, given the blowback that could come from a blowup in the Persian Gulf, it might even make us all safer.
Tom Engelhardt, co-founder of the American Empire Project and the author of The American Way of War: How Bush's Wars Became Obama's as well as The End of Victory Culture, runs the Nation Institute's TomDispatch.com. His latest book, The United States of Fear (Haymarket Books), has just been published. To listen to Timothy MacBain's latest Tomcast audio interview in which Engelhardt discusses reversal scenarios on a one-way planet, click here, or download it to your iPod here.
**********************************************
Note: The initial "Iranian" news article in this piece was taken, with a few small changes, from "New U.S. Commando Team Operating Near Iran," a post by the intrepid Spencer Ackerman of Wired's Danger Room blog, an important place to keep up on all things military. Let me offer a bow as well to Antiwar.com, Juan Cole's Informed Comment, and Paul Woodward's the War in Context. I don't know what I'd do without them when it comes to keeping up.]
***********************************************
Follow TomDispatch on Twitter @TomDispatch and join us on Facebook.
Copyright 2012 Tom Engelhardt
WAR FOR THE WHITE HOUSE!!
Diebold accidently leaks 2012 election results (2)
By Jean Anne Whorton. The Onion.
The Onion
Wednesday, Jan 25, 2012
Editorial Comment: For the last 10 years Axis of Logic has consistently boycotted US national elections. Do not participate in the fraudulent 2012 elections in the United States. Do not give credibilty to a false democracy. Your most powerful vote is abstention.
Vote on your feet. Vote on the street.
~Axis of Logic Editorial Board
~Axis of Logic Editorial Board
The Conundrum of Iran - "In essence, a war against Iran – up to date a secret war – is underway" ~Leonid Savin 1
"Inducing the regime change in Iran, which is Washington's end goal, still takes a pretext. .... Washington's choice of pretexts for an aggression comprises at least three options, namely (1) Iran's nuclear dossier; (2) an engineered escalation in the Strait of Hormuz; (3) allegations that Iran supports international terrorism" "Former CIA operative Phillip Giraldi writes that the US and Israeli agents have been active in Iran for quite some time and are responsible for the epidemic of the Stuxnet virus and the series of assassinations of Iranian nuclear physicists" The Conundrum of Iran
|
هنوز هم بعد از اين همه سال، چهره‌ي ويلان را از ياد نمي‌برم. در واقع، در طول سي سال گذشته، هميشـه روز اول مـاه کـه حقوق بازنشستگي را دريافت مي‌کنم، به ياد ويلان مي‌افتم ويلان پتي اف، کارمند دبيرخانه‌ي اداره بود. از مال دنيا، جز حقوق اندک کارمندي هيچ عايدي ديگري نداشت. ويلان، اول ماه که حقوق مي‌گرفت و جيبش پر مي‌شد، شروع مي‌کرد به حرف زدن روز اول ماه و هنگامي‌که که از بانک به اداره برمي‌گشت، به‌راحتي مي‌شد برآمدگي جيب سمت چپش را تشخيص داد که تمام حقوقش را در آن چپانده بود ويلان از روزي که حقوق مي‌گرفت تا روز پانزدهم ماه که پولش ته مي‌کشيد، نيمي از ماه سيگار برگ مي‌کشيد، نيمـي از مـاه مست بود و سرخوش من يازده سال با ويلان هم‌کار بودم. بعدها شنيدم، او سي سال آزگار به همين نحو گذران روزگار کرده است. روز آخر کـه من از اداره منتقل مي‌شدم، ويلان روي سکوي جلوي دبيرخانه نشسته بود و سيگار برگ مي‌کشيد. به سراغش رفتم تا از او خداحافظي کنم کنارش نشستم و بعد از کلي حرف مفت زدن، عاقبت پرسيدم که چرا سعي نمي کند زندگي‌اش را سر و سامان بدهد تا از اين وضع نجات پيدا کند؟ هيچ وقت يادم نمي‌رود. همين که سوال را پرسيدم، به سمت من برگشت و با چهره‌اي متعجب، آن هم تعجبي طبيعي و اصيل پرسيد: کدام وضع؟ بهت زده شدم. همينطور که به او زل زده بودم، بدون اين‌که حرکتي کنم، ادامه دادم همين زندگي نصف اشرافي، نصف گداييويلان با شنيدن اين جمله، همان‌طور که زل زده بود به من، ادامه داد تا حالا سيگار برگ اصل کشيدي؟ گفتم: نه گفت: تا حالا تاکسي دربست گرفتي؟ گفتم: نه گفت: تا حالا به يک کنسرت عالي رفتي؟ گفتم: نه گفت: تا حالا غذاي فرانسوي خوردي؟ گفتم نه گفت: تا حالا همه پولتو براي عشقت هديه خريدي تا سورپرايزش كني؟ گفتم: نه ! گفت: اصلا عاشق بودي؟ گفتم: نه گفت: تا حالا يه هفته مسکو موندي خوش بگذروني؟ گفتم: نه ! گفت: خاک بر سرت، تا حالا زندگي کردي؟ با درماندگي گفتم: آره، ...... نه، ..... نمي دونم !!! ويلان همينطور نگاهم مي‌کرد. نگاهي تحقيرآميز و سنگين .... حالا که خوب نگاهش مي‌کردم، مردي جذاب بود و سالم. به خودم که آمدم، ويلان جلويم ايستاده بود و تاکسي رسيده بود. ويلان سيگار برگي تعارفم کرد و بعد جمله‌اي را گفت. جمله‌اي را گفت که مسير زندگي‌ام را به کلي عوض کرد. ويلان پرسيد: مي‌دوني تا کي زنده‌اي؟ جواب دادم: نه ! ويلان گفت: پس سعي کن دست کم نصف ماه رو زندگي کنی *************************************** هر 60 ثانيه اي رو كه با عصبانيت، ناراحتي و يا ديوانگي بگذراني، از دست دادن يك دقيقه از خوشبختي است كه ديگر به تو باز نميگردد *********************************** زندگي كوتاه است، قواعد را بشكن، سريع فراموش كن، به آرامي ببوس، واقعاً عاشق باش، بدون محدوديت بخند، و هيچ چيزي كه باعث خنده ات ميگردد را رد نكن ********************************** داستان بالا سالهای سال است که عصاره بینش من نیز میباشد. من نیز عمیقا معتقدم اونائی که همش حرص امنیت مالی رو میخورن (با خسیس بازی و تلنبار کردن ذخیره بانکی بجای استفاده بهینی از آن) زندگی که نمیکنن هیچ بلکه مرگ و بیهودگی تدریجی رو تجربه میکنند . به زبانی دیگر وقتی ریسک نمیکنی و زندگی رو به فردا-یعنی هیچوقت-موکول میکنی, ول معطلی و حماقت محضه! حال اونکه کسانی که آزادگی رو /یشه خود میکنن و از تمامی امکانات مادی- معنویشون(حالا هر چقدر که هست) بهترین استفاده رو میبرن سالمترین و خوشبخترین افراد هستند! خلاصه کنم × بقول اریک فروم "بودن" را به "داشتن" ترجیح دادن ,اینه معنای زندگی حقیقی و آزادمنشانه /یمان /ایدار |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)