in the
Philippines
ایالات متحده کمک و تشویق میکند
جنایات جنگی را در فیلیپین
By: Marjorie Cohn
July 24, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - After
Sept. 11, 2001, President George W. Bush declared the
Philippines a second front in the war on terror
(“Operation Enduring Freedom-Philippines”). The
Philippine government used this as an opportunity to
escalate its war against Muslim separatists and other
individuals and organizations opposing the policies of
the government. The egregious human rights violations
committed by the Philippine military and paramilitary
forces are some of the most underreported atrocities
in the media today.
پس از سپتامبر. 11، 2001، جرج دبلیو بوش فیلیپین را بعنوان جبهه دوم در جنگ علیه ترور اعلام نمود ("عملیات دوام آزادی- فیلیپین"). دولت فیلیپین از این به عنوان یک فرصت طلائی استفاده کرد برای تشدید جنگش علیه مسلمانان تجزیه طلب و دیگر افراد و سازمان هائی که مخالف سیاست هایش میباشند . نقض فاحش حقوق بشرمرتکب شده توسط نیروهای نظامی و شبه نظامی فیلیپین برخی از کمترین اخبار گزارش شده از جنایات در رسانه های امروز است .
The International Peoples’ Tribunal on Crimes Against
the Filipino People, held July 16-18 in Washington,
D.C., drew upward of 300 people. An international
panel of seven jurors heard two days of testimony from
32 witnesses, many of whom had been tortured,
arbitrarily detained and forcibly evicted from their
land. Some testified to being present when their loved
ones, including children, were gunned down by the
Philippine military or paramilitary. I testified as an
expert witness on international human rights
violations in the Philippines, many of which were
aided and abetted by the U.S. government.
Thirty-one-year-old Melissa Roxas was a community
health adviser who went to the Philippines in 2009 to
conduct health surveys in central Luzon, where people
were dying from cholera and diarrhea. In May of that
year, 15 men in civilian clothes with high-powered
rifles and wearing bonnets and ski masks forced her
into a van and handcuffed and blindfolded her. They
beat her, suffocated her and used other forms of
torture on her until releasing her six days later.
Roxas was continually interrogated and even threatened
with death during her horrific torture. She was likely
released because she is a U.S. citizen (she has dual
citizenship).
But WikiLeaks revealed that although the U.S. Embassy
was aware of Roxas’ torture and abduction, it did
nothing to secure her release. Roxas convinced the
Philippines Court of Appeals to grant her petition for
writ of amparo, which confirmed she had been abducted
and tortured. Nevertheless, the Philippine government
refuses to mount an investigation into her ordeal. And
although she lives in the United States, Roxas remains
under surveillance.
“Whenever you work with communities,” Roxas testified,
“[the Philippine government] vilifies you as a member
of the New Peoples Army [NPA].” Ironically, the
Philippine military claimed it was the NPA, the armed
wing of the Philippine Communist Party, that abducted
Roxas. Her physical and emotional scars remain. But,
Roxas told the tribunal, “I have the privilege of
being in the United States,” unlike many other
Filipino victims of human rights violations.
People and groups have been labeled “terrorists” by
the Philippine government, the U.S. government and
other countries at the behest of the U.S. government.
The Philippine government engages in “red
tagging”—political vilification. Targets are
frequently human rights activists and advocates,
political opponents, community organizers or groups
struggling for national liberation. Those targeted for
assassination are placed on the “order of battle”
list.
The tribunal documented 262 cases of extrajudicial
killings, 27 cases of forced disappearances, 125 cases
of torture, 1,016 cases of illegal arrest, and 60,155
incidents of forced evacuation—many to make way for
extraction by mining companies—from July 2010 to June
30 of this year by Philippine police, military,
paramilitary or other state agents operating within
the chain of command.
As part of the U.S. war on terror, in 2002 the Gloria
Macapagal-Arroyo government created the Oplan Bantay
Laya, a counterinsurgency program modeled on U.S.
strategies, ostensibly to fight communist guerrillas.
After 9/11, the Bush administration gave Arroyo $100
million to fund the campaign in the Philippines.
The government of Benigno Aquino III continued the
program in 2011 under the name Oplan Bayanihan. It
does not distinguish between civilians and combatants,
which is considered a war crime under the Rome Statute
and the Geneva Conventions.
Oplan Bayanihan has led to tremendous repression,
including large numbers of extrajudicial killings,
forced disappearances, torture and cruel treatment.
Many civilians, including children, have been killed.
Hundreds of members of progressive organizations were
murdered by Philippine military and paramilitary death
squads. Communities and leaders opposed to large-scale
and invasive mining have been targeted. Even ordinary
people with no political affiliation have not escaped
the government’s campaign of terror.
One witness testified that although the
counterinsurgency program was presented in the guise
of “peace and development,” it was really an
“operational guide to crush any resistance by those
who work for social justice and support the poor and
oppressed.”
Philippine military and paramilitary forces apparently
rationalize their harsh treatment as necessary to
maintain national security against people and
organizations that seek to challenge, or even
overthrow, the government. However, the Convention
Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment (CAT) says, “No exceptional
circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a
threat of war, internal political instability or any
other public emergency, may be invoked as
justification for torture.” Both the Philippines and
the United States are parties to the convention on
torture.
A 14-year-old boy testified that as he was walking
with family members to harvest their crops, “We were
fired upon” by soldiers. “We said, ‘We are children,
sir.’ ” But the soldiers killed his 8-year-old
brother. “I embraced him. The soldier said we were
enemies. He was bleeding, the bullet exited in the
back. He was dead when my mother saw him. We made an
affidavit against the soldiers but it was dismissed by
the prosecutor.”
Raymond Manalo was an eyewitness to kidnapping,
torture, rape and forced disappearances. He testified
that he saw civilians burned alive by soldiers and
paramilitary forces. Two women were hit with wooden
sticks and burned with a cigarette. Sticks were
inserted into their genitals. The two women
disappeared and have not been seen since. Although a
case was filed, there has been no resolution.
Cynthia Jaramillo testified that her husband, Arnold,
was one of nine unarmed men killed in a massive
military operation that lasted almost a month.
Although Arnold was a member of the NPA, “They were
not killed during a legitimate running battle,” she
said. “The state of their bodies when recovered
clearly indicated the torture, willful killing and
desecration of the remains.” Arnold was taken alive
and killed at close range by multiple gunshot wounds,
his internal organs lacerated, his jaws and teeth
shattered. This violates the Geneva Conventions and
constitutes illegal extrajudicial killing off the
battlefield.
Continuing the Bush policy of the pivot to
Asia-Pacific, as a counterweight to China, President
Barack Obama enlisted the Aquino government last year
to negotiate the Enhanced Defense Cooperation
Agreement. While paying lip service to the
Philippines’ maintaining sovereignty over the military
bases in their country, it actually grants tremendous
powers to U.S. forces. The United States also wants to
return to its two former military bases at Subic Bay
and Clark, which it left in 1992. Those bases were
critical to the U.S. imperial war in Vietnam. A U.S.
return would violate the well-established right of
peoples to self-determination enshrined in the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
(ICCPR).
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
(ICC) includes a prohibition on aiding and abetting
liability for war crimes. An individual can be
convicted of a war crime in the ICC if he or she
“aids, abets or otherwise assists” in the commission
or attempted commission of the crime. This includes
“providing the means for its commission.”
Between 2001 and 2010, the U.S. government furnished
more than $507 million in military aid to the
Philippine government, enabling it to commit war
crimes. U.S. political and military leaders could be
liable in the ICC for war crimes as aiders and
abettors.
The United States planned and helped carry out the
botched Mamasapano raid on January 25, 2015. Dozens
died when commandos from the Special Action Force of
the Philippine National Police entered Mamasapano,
where the separatist Moro Islamic Liberation Front had
a stronghold. The Obama administration had put a $5
million bounty on terror suspect Marwan’s head.
According to the Philippine Daily Inquirer, US drones
identified Marwan’s hiding place, led the commandos to
it, and provided real-time management capacity for the
operation off the battlefield. Marwan was killed but
his finger was severed and disappeared. It then
appeared at an FBI lab in the United States a few days
later. DNA tests on the finger confirmed it was Marwan
who had been killed.
Murder, torture and cruel treatment constitute war
crimes under the Rome Statute and the Geneva
Conventions. Both the United States and the
Philippines are parties to the Geneva Conventions. But
although the Philippines is a party to the Rome
Statute, the United States is not. In fact, the U.S.
government offered the Philippine government $30
million in additional military aid to secure an
agreement that U.S. soldiers in the Philippines would
not be turned over to the ICC.
The jury in the tribunal found defendant Aquino and
defendant Government of the United States of America,
represented by Obama, guilty of war crimes and crimes
against humanity. “Indeed,” the panel wrote, “the
Prosecution has satisfied the burden of proving
satisfactorily that the Defendants, in concert with
each other, willfully and feloniously committed gross
and systematic violations of Filipino people’s basic
human rights.”
The jurors decided, “The killings and disappearances
follow a pattern. The victims are vilified as members
of the Communist Party of the Philippines, and
subjected to red tagging ... after vilification, the
victims are subjected to surveillance and then later
killed or abducted.” The panel noted, “These are not
random violations.” They are “not isolated but
state-sponsored, part of a policy deliberately adopted
to silence the critics of the government.” They called
it “state terror,” drawing an analogy with the
military and authoritarian regimes in Latin America in
the 1970s and ’80s, which were also supported by the
United States.
“Terrorist tagging,” according to the jurors, is not
just intended to define military targets but also to
“sabotage the peace process between the National
Democratic Front (NDF) and the Philippine government.”
In fact, Jose Maria Sison, the NDF’s chief political
consultant, has been classified by the United States
as a “person supporting terrorism.” Sison’s assets
have been frozen and he is forbidden to travel, in
violation of the ICCPR. The European Union’s
second-highest court ruled to delist Sison as a
“person supporting terrorism” and reversed a decision
by member governments to freeze assets. Yet he remains
on the U.S. terrorism list.
Moreover, the jury determined, “the failure of the
Philippine government through Defendant Aquino to
identify, investigate and/or prosecute the
perpetrators of these violations is among the
contributing factors to the prevailing impunity in the
Philippines.”
The jury urged the defendants to undertake “proper
remedial measures to prevent the commission or
continuance of such illegal and criminal acts, to
repair the damages done to the Filipino people and
their environment, compensate the victims and their
families for their atrocities, and to rehabilitate the
communities, especially indigenous communities that
have been destroyed by the criminal acts of the
Defendants.”
The panel concluded, “We also encourage the peoples of
the world to seek redress, to pursue justice [under
universal jurisdiction], and to transform this
oppressive, exploitative and repressive global state
of affairs exemplified by the experience and plight of
the Filipino people, to challenge the international
‘rule of law,’ and to construct a global order founded
on full respect for the rights of all peoples,
everywhere.”
*************************************
Marjorie Cohn is a former president of the National
Lawyers Guild and a professor at Thomas Jefferson
School of Law, where she teaches criminal law and
procedure, evidence, and international human rights
law. She lectures throughout the world on human rights
and US foreign policy.
مارجوری کوهن رئیس سابق انجمن ملی وکلا میباشد و استاد در دانشکده حقوق تاماس جفرسون، جایی که او به تدریس حقوق کیفری و روش ، شواهد، و حقوق بشر جهانی مشغول است. او در سراسر جهان پیرامون حقوق بشر و سیاست خارجی ایالات متحده نیز سخنرانی میکند .
|
Tuesday, August 18, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment