Christopher
Bollyn, Journaliste Sans Frontiéres, January 9, 2013
"My
conclusion is simple. Nepotism works." - Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, (1926 -2012),
publisher of the New York Times, “a tightly held family operation since
1896.”
On December 30, 2012, the New York Times published a
disturbing anti-American editorial entitled “Let’s Give Up on the Constitution,”
written by Louis Michael Seidman, a professor of constitutional law at
Georgetown University. As it was surely intended to do, the editorial caused a
great deal of consternation among patriotic Americans.
Louis Michael Seidman, a scion of the B'nai
B'rith, penned the editorial trashing the U.S. Constitution. Seidman’s piece
claims that “obedience to the Constitution” with its “downright evil provisions”
is responsible for the “broken” American system of government: "As the
nation teeters at the edge of fiscal chaos, observers are reaching the
conclusion that the American system of government is broken. But almost no one
blames the culprit: our insistence on obedience to the Constitution, with all
its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions."
It is,
however, not obedience but disobedience to the Constitution, exactly like that
promoted by Seidman, that is behind the “broken” state of our system of
government. The most egregious examples of this Constitutional disobedience are
the continuous violations of Article I, Section 8, in which the powers of
Congress are specified:
The
Congress shall have Power…
To coin
money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin… and
To declare
War…
For the
past century Congress has completely abdicated its power to coin money by
allowing U.S. currency to be issued by a cartel of privately-owned banks known
as the Federal Reserve System. Secondly, the U.S. has waged numerous wars around
the world during the past 65 years not one of which was declared by Congress.
These two blatant violations of the Constitution are responsible for most of the
financial problems currently faced by the U.S. government.
A
constitution is a body of fundamental principles according to which a state is
governed. To say we should “give up on the Constitution” is to say we should
give up on the American system of government. For alternatives to the American
system, Seidman points to nations like Britain and New Zealand, nations which
have no constitution. The revolutionary difference of the American system is
that in the United States the people are sovereign while in Britain and New
Zealand it is the Queen of England who is sovereign. The American Revolution
was fought over that difference.
The
revolutionary concept of American popular sovereignty is contained in the first
three words of the Constitution: We The People. As Benjamin Franklin said, "In
free governments, the rulers are the servants and the people their superiors and
sovereigns."
The
revolutionary concept of popular sovereignty is enshrined in the first three
words of the Constitution.
So why
would the New York Times publish an anti-American editorial that calls for
giving up the Constitution and the system of government it provides? To
understand this we need to understand what the New York Times is, and who it
really represents.
The editor
of the editorial page of the New York Times is Andrew Rosenthal, who oversees the paper's
opinion pages. The editorial department of the paper is completely separate from
the news operations and Mr. Rosenthal answers directly to the publisher, Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr.
The New
York Times is a family-owned newspaper, controlled by the Sulzberger
family. The paper is owned by The New York Times Company, which publishes
18 other newspapers, including the International Herald Tribune and The Boston
Globe. Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr. is
the chairman of the company and his family has controlled the paper since
1896.
The
Sulzberger family is a Jewish family from Baden, in southern Germany. The
Sulzbergers are closely tied to the Rothschild family, which comes from the same
part of Germany. Ferdinand Sulzberger, for example, was the first of the
Sulzbergers from Baden to immigrate to America. Before coming to America,
Sulzberger studied business in a mercantile firm in Frankfurt, the home of the
Rothschild family. He probably worked with the Rothschilds. Subsequently,
after making a fortune in America with his meat packing business, Sulzberger’s
daughter Lily married Victor Sydney Rothschild, the eldest son of Victor Henry
Rothschild. The two fathers served on the board of trustees of Temple Beth-El
on Fifth Avenue in New York City.
One of the
most significant connections between the Sulzberger and Rothschild families is
that they both belong to the leadership
level of the Jewish Zionist secret society known as the International Order of
B’nai B’rith. Louis Michael Seidman’s grandfather was a president of the
Victory Lodge 1481 of B’nai B’rith. The younger generations of these families
are surely members of the same secret society – but keep it secret.
The
Sulzberger and Rothschild families have long conspired together to change the
world to suit their agenda. Some of their global plans have been published in
the pages of the New York Times, which has served as their media megaphone for
the past century. In 1907, for example, the paper carried an article entitled
“Will People the West with the Russian Jews.”
The
Sulzberger and Rothschild families work together to advance their global
agenda. Their project in 1907 to populate the American West with Russian Jews
is just one example.
In the
article, Cyrus L. Sulzberger (of the family that controls the NYT) announced
that he was heading a project to bring large numbers of Russian Jews directly to
Galveston, Texas. The project to populate the American West with Russian Jews
was funded by Jacob H. Schiff and the Rothschild family. It is interesting to
note that the emigration project was not a U.S. government initiative but was
first conceived and announced in London, where the treasurer for the operation
was Leopold de Rothschild. The B’nai B’rith and these same Zionist families had
operated similar Jewish emigration programs in Eastern Europe for decades.
Understanding that the Sulzberger family
controlling the New York Times is closely connected to the Rothschilds, the
leading family of British Zionists, may help explain why they published the
Seidman piece trashing the U.S. Constitution. This connection also explains why
the New York Times published an editorial on the third anniversary of 9-11,
which said, “…we've begun to understand that it's possible to know what happened
without knowing what happened.”
The New
York Times, which should have conducted its own investigation, actually played a
key role in the cover-up of the truth of 9-11. Three years later the paper told
its readers that they did not need to know what happened on 9-11. Why would the
leading newspaper in the city in which 3,000 people were killed on 9-11 say such
a thing?
The
Sulzberger-owned paper published that editorial for the same reason it published
the propaganda pieces by Judith Miller, which falsely claimed that Iraq
possessed weapons of mass destruction: to advance the rapacious agenda of the
Rothschild family and their Zionist state of Israel.
The state
of Israel serves as the operational arm and iron fist of the British Zionist
movement, which is headed by the Rothschild family. The Balfour Declaration in
1917, for example, which first promised Britain’s support for “the establishment
in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people,” was addressed to Walter
Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild, after all.
For the
Sulzberger and Rothschild families the United States is a nation they seek to
control and dominate. The terrorism of 9-11 was a false-flag operation that
they sponsored and controlled through their strategic asset, the state of
Israel. The Zionist-controlled media was then deployed to deceive the public
about what really happened. The strategic goal was to change American public
opinion and bring the U.S. military into the Middle East to seize valuable
assets and protect their beleaguered Zionist state. Undermining the United
States by attacking the U.S. Constitution is simply part of their agenda.
Understanding who is behind this evil agenda is essential to stopping it.
Sources and
Recommended Reading:
“Let’s Give
Up on the Constitution,” by Louis Michael Seidman, New York Times, December 30,
2012 http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/31/opinion/lets-give-up-on-the-constitution.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&
Sulzberger,
Jewish Encyclopedia (1906)
“Will
People the West with the Russian Jews,” New York Times, January 5, 1907
No comments:
Post a Comment