فیلمبرداری از خشونت علیه حیوانات
Taping of Farm CrueltyIs Becoming the Crime
!! به جرم مبدل میشود
******************************
[as disgusting and morally bankrupt a development as any sane 'society' could possibly condone; another spotlight on violence-addicted America;
btw, have you heard of hog dogging? another barbaric american family fun-time; google for more; see also Barbaric Blood "sport" packaged as family entertainment what more will it take amerika? echos here of punishment laid on Bradley Manning and other whistle-blowers; in his case, for having the audacity to expose unpunished/condoned US military terrorism/criminality what a country... sick, sick, sick Imagine, having a debate on torturing animals! and no debate btw on assassinations !#@!!] Piaff Soto
*********************************
On one covert video, farm workers illegally burn the ankles of
Tennessee walking horses with chemicals. Another captures workers in Wyoming punching and
kicking pigs and flinging piglets into the air. And at one of the country’s
largest egg suppliers, a video shows hens caged alongside rotting bird
corpses, while workers burn and snap off the beaks of young chicks.
The Humane Society of the United States
Each video — all shot in the last two years by undercover animal rights
activists — drew a swift response: Federal prosecutors in Tennessee charged the
horse trainer and other workers, who have pleaded guilty, with violating the Horse Protection Act. Local authorities in Wyoming charged
nine farm employees with cruelty to animals. And the egg supplier, which
operates in Iowa and other states, lost one of its biggest customers,
McDonald’s, which said the video played a part in its decision.
But a dozen or so state legislatures have had a different reaction:
They proposed or enacted bills that would make it illegal to covertly
videotape livestock farms, or apply
for a job at one without disclosing ties to animal rights groups.
They have also drafted measures to require such videos to be given to the
authorities almost immediately, which activists say would thwart any meaningful
undercover investigation of large factory farms.
Critics call them “Ag-Gag” bills.
Some of the legislation appears inspired by the American Legislative Exchange Council, a business
advocacy group with hundreds of state representatives from farm states as
members. The group creates model bills, drafted by lobbyists and lawmakers, that
in the past have included such things as “stand your ground” gun laws and
tighter voter identification rules.
One of the group’s model bills, “The Animal and Ecological Terrorism Act,”
prohibits filming or taking pictures on livestock farms to “defame the facility
or its owner.” Violators would be placed on a “terrorist registry.”
Officials from the group did not respond to a request for comment.
Animal rights activists say they have not
seen legislation that would require them to register as terrorists, but they say other measures
— including laws passed last year in Iowa, Utah and Missouri — make it nearly
impossible to produce similar undercover exposés. Some groups say that they have
curtailed activism in those states.
“It definitely has had a chilling effect on
our ability to conduct undercover investigations,” said Vandhana Bala, general
counsel for Mercy for
Animals, which has shot many videos, including the egg-farm
investigation in 2011. (McDonald’s said that video showed “disturbing and
completely unacceptable” behavior, but that none of the online clips were from
the Iowa farm that supplied its eggs. Ms. Bala, though, said that some video
showing bird carcasses in cages did come from that facility.)
The American
Farm Bureau Federation, which lobbies for the agricultural and meat
industries, criticized the mistreatment seen on some videos. But the group
cautions that some methods represent best practices endorsed by animal-care
experts.
The videos may seem troubling to someone
unfamiliar with farming, said Kelli Ludlum, the group’s director of
Congressional relations, but they can be like seeing open-heart surgery for the
first time.
“They could be performing a perfect
procedure, but you would consider it abhorrent that they were cutting a person
open,” she said.
In coming weeks, Indiana and Tennessee are
expected to vote on similar measures, while states from California to
Pennsylvania continue to debate them.
Opponents have scored some recent
victories, as a handful of bills have died, including those in New Mexico and
New Hampshire. In Wyoming, the legislation stalled after loud opposition from
animal rights advocates, including Bob Barker, former host of “The Price is
Right.”
In Indiana, an expansive bill became one of the most controversial of the
state legislative session, drawing heated opposition from labor groups and the
state press association, which said the measure violated the First Amendment.
After numerous constitutional objections, the bill was redrafted and will be
unveiled Monday, said Greg Steuerwald, a Republican state representative and
chairman of the Judiciary Committee.
The new bill would require job applicants to disclose material information or
face criminal penalties, a provision that opponents say would prevent undercover
operatives from obtaining employment. And employees who do something beyond the
scope of their jobs could be charged with criminal trespass.
An employee who took a video on a livestock farm with his phone and gave it
to someone else would “probably” run afoul of the proposed law, Mr. Steuerwald
said. The bill will apply not just to farms, but to all employers, he added.
Nancy J. Guyott, the president of the Indiana chapter of the A.F.L.-C.I.O.,
said she feared that the legislation would punish whistle-blowers.
Nationally, animal rights advocates fear
that they will lose a valuable tool that fills the void of what they say is weak
or nonexistent regulation.
Livestock companies say that their
businesses have suffered financially from unfair videos that are less about
protecting animals than persuading consumers to stop eating meat.
Don Lehe, a Republican state representative
from a rural district in Indiana, said online videos can cast farmers in a false
light and give them little opportunity to correct the record.
“That property owner is essentially guilty
before they had the chance to address the issue,” Mr. Lehe said.
|
Saturday, April 13, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment