Introduction ~  I, personaly am against nuclear power for Iran-or any other country for that matter.First of all, Iran has tons of natural gas reserves which is relatively cheap energy resourses to begin with.Secondly, because of  its natural habitant , Iran could and should use solar energy quite extensively .It would be clean,safe and end up being very cheap as well.Spending billions of dollars,in the last 30 years,to develop nuclear power has been a total waste of money for the hard hit economy of Iran .Russians have obviously milked Iran for their own benefit,raising their rate constantly.

More over,if  the U.S puppet,$hah, was given the green light -then- to go a head with "his" nuclear ambitions does not necessairly make it right for Islamic government to develop nuclear power!! So, Robert Fisk's quotation that follows, for me, has no political meaning rather than a indirect "justification" for a reactionary religious regime's upcoming agenda,i.e terroristic purposes.

 Iranian masses are sick and tired of  oppresive/fascist Islamic regime with a neoliberal ,pro IMF,World Bank agenda which has pushed 70 % of population into poverty,30% of them in absolute misery.Economic sanctions would not obviously be in favor of the general public in Iran either.The only humane and progressive way to get ride of Islamic regime's nightmare, that Iranian are living under, is a democratic revolution led by the masses themselves.

Long live the democratic aspirations of the Iranian masses.Down with Islamic Regime in Iran.

PaYmaN PieDaR

*******************************************************

" ....details [re Iran's nuclear program] are popping with the same frequency as all the poppycock about Saddam's titanic arsenal. Not to mention the date problem. When did all this start? The Shah. The old boy wanted nuclear power. He even said he wanted a bomb because "the US and the Soviet Union had nuclear bombs" and no one objected. Europeans rushed to supply the dictator's wish. Siemens – not Russia – built the Bushehr nuclear facility. And when Ayatollah Khomeini, Scourge of the West, Apostle of Shia Revolution, etc, took over Iran in 1979, he ordered the entire nuclear project to be closed down because it was "the work of the Devil". Only when Saddam invaded Iran – with our Western encouragement – and started using poison gas against the Iranians (chemical components arriving from the West, of course) was Khomeini persuaded to reopen it." ~Robert Fisk Pups on Parade EU Obediently Pushes Toward War with Iran By Chris Floyd The aim of this endless string of sanctions, this constant tightening of the noose, is not more "negotiations." It is regime change, by any means necessary. excerpts: "This week, the warlords of the West took yet another step toward their long-desired war againt Iran. (Open war, that is; their covert war has been going on for decades -- via subversion, terrorism, and proxies like Saddam Hussein.) On Monday, the European Union obediently followed the dictates of its Washington masters by agreeing to impose an embargo on Iranian oil." ... "The aim of this endless string of sanctions, this constant tightening of the noose, is not more "negotiations." It is regime change, by any means necessary." http://www.chris-floyd.com/component/content/article/1-latest-news/2210-pups-on-parade-eu-obediently-pushes-toward-war-with-iran.html The Reality Behind the Coming "Regime Change" in Syria By Shamus Cooke After meeting again to decide Syria's fate, the Arab League again decided to extend its "monitoring mission" in Syria. However, some Arab League nations under U.S. diplomatic control are clamoring for blood. These countries — virtual sock puppets of U.S. foreign policy — want to declare the Arab League monitoring mission "a failure,” so that military intervention — in the form of a no fly zone — can be used for regime change. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28853

Photos

Download All

• Untitled2.2.gif