نوشته های پیتر وینتر
ترجمه بخشهائی از این متن : پیمان پایدار
Tuesday, September 22, 2015
کنفرانس وانسه : داغان شدن دروغی دیگر
The Wannsee Conference: Another Lie Crushed
یکی از اسطوره های معمولا تکرار شده پیرامون هولوکاست اینست که که نازی
ها با برگزاری کنفرانسی در حومه برلین بنام وانسه در 20 ژانویه 1942، طرح
از بین بردن یهودی ها را " ریختند" .
One of the more commonly perpetuated myths
around the Holocaust is that the Nazis held a conference in the Berlin suburb
of Wannsee on January 20, 1942, where the “extermination of the Jews was
planned.”
One of the high-profile claims in this
regard was made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, at the UnitedNations in 2009, when he held up a copy of the minutes of the Wannsee meeting,
and told the world that:
“There, on January 20, 1942, after a hearty meal, senior Nazi officials met and decided how to exterminate the Jewish people. The detailed minutes of that meeting have been preserved by successive German governments. Here is a copy of those minutes, in which the Nazis issued precise instructions on how to carry out the extermination of the Jews. Is this a lie?”
The simple answer to Netanyahu’s question
is, yes, this is a lie. An outright, shameless, blatant lie.
جواب ساده به سخنان نتانیاهو در سازمان ملل در سال 2009چنین است : دروغی بیش نیست.دروغی شرم آگین
The actual minutes of the Wannsee Conference
can be read in their entirety—in the original German here, and in full English
translation, thanks to the work of Francis Dupont, in his small book The Myth of the Wannsee Conference ($6.95 on Amazon). I cannot recommend that
book enough.
کتاب فوق الذکر در مورد نوشته های چنین کنفرانس بنام :" اسطوره کنفرانس وانسه" توسط فرنسیس دوپان
As Dupont’s book clearly shows:
- The Wannsee meeting and its minutes do
not contain a master plan to kill Jews;
- Nowhere in the meeting’s minutes is
genocide discussed, planned, proposed, or even suggested;
- The Wannsee meeting never discussed gas
chambers, shootings, or any of the fantasies propagated by the
exterminationists;
- The Wannsee Minutes reported that there
were only 4.5 million Jews under German control (yet 4.3 million Jewish
compensation claims have been lodged against the postwar German government);
تعداد یهودیان تحت کنترل آلمانها 4 میلیون و نیم گزارش شده است....در حالی که بعد از جنگ بیش از 4 میلیون و سیصد هزار یهودی درخواست غرامت جنگی از آلمانها تقاضا کرده اند .
- The Wannsee meeting was a planning
meeting on how Europe’s Jews should be deported, via transit camps, to the
East; with able-bodied Jews being forced to build roads and other labor
intensive tasks in those regions;
در این گردهم آئی چگونگی اخراج یهودیان , از راه کمپ ها بسمت شرق, بررسی شده است ;در ضمن در مورد افرادی که از لحاظ فیزیکی قابلیت کاری داشته بگونه اجباری در ساخت جاده ها و دیگر کار گذارده شدند
- The Wannsee Conference also made
allowance for specific exceptions to Jewish evacuation, such as Jewish German
World War I veterans; ALL Jews over the age of 65; and ALL Jews working in
industries vital to the German war effort, to be released from the threat of evacuation
and be allowed to stay in Germany.
در ضمن در این کنفرانس استثناهائی نیز بر شمرده شده است : یهودیان شرکت کننده در جنگ جهانی اول , یهودیان بالای 65 سال و تمامی یهودیانی که در حال خدمت /کار در صنایع مهم جنگی بودند از اخراج شدن معاف گردیدند
There is therefore, no justification for
the allegation that the Wannsee Conference was a ‘master plan for mass murder’
and everyone who claims this to be the case, from Netanyahu down, is simply
lying.
That the Wannsee Conference never discussed
killing Jews in any way, has actually been confirmed in public by Yehuda Bauer,
professor of Holocaust Studies at the Avraham Harman Institute of
Contemporary Jewry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Bauer is also the founding editor of the
journal Holocaust and Genocide
Studies, and a member of the editorial board of the Encyclopaedia of the Holocaust,
published by Yad Vashem in 1990.
He is not, therefore, as some
Holocaust storytellers claim, some obscure figure, but a leading and major—in
fact, one of the most senior—Jews promoting the Holocaust fable.
As long ago as 1992(!), Bauer, speaking at
a conference held in London to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the Wannsee
meeting, told the audience that the claim that Wannsee was a “master plan” to
kill Jews was nothing a but a “silly story.”
Bauer’s remarks were reported in the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of January 23,
1992, and the Canadian Jewish Times
of January 30, 1992.
Titled “Nazi Shceme Not Born at Wannsee, Israeli Holocaust Scholar Claims,” the
JTA report continued:
London (JTA)—An Israeli Holocaust scholar has de-bunked the Wannsee Conference, at which top Nazi officials are said to have gathered at a villa in a Berlin suburb in 1942 to draw the blueprints of the ‘Final Solution.’
According to Prof. Yehuda Bauer of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Wannsee was a meeting, ‘but hardly a conference’, and ‘little of what was said there was executed in detail.’
Bauer addressed the opening session of an international conference held here to mark the 50th anniversary of the decision to carry out the "Final Solution". "But it was not made at Wannsee", the Czech born scholar said.
"The public still repeats, time after time, the silly story that at Wannsee the extermination of the Jews was arrived at, Wannsee was but a stage in the unfolding of the process of mass murder," he said.
His comments were repeated in the Canadian Jewish News, which read as
follows:
Wannsee’s importance rejected
London (JTA) — An Israeli Holocaust scholar has debunked the Wannsee Conference, at which top Nazi officials are said to have gathered at a villa in a Berlin suburb in 1942 to draw the blueprints of the “Final Solution.”
According to Prof. Yehuda Bauer (photo) of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Wannsee was a meeting, “but hardly a conference”, and “little of what was said there was executed in detail.”
“The public still repeats, time after time, the silly story that at Wannsee the extermination of the Jews was arrived at.”
In other words, even the leading “Holocaust
scholar” in Israel knows that to claim that the Wannsee Conference was all
about “killing Jews,” or as Netanyahu told the United Nations, that the minutes
contain “precise instructions on how to carry out the extermination of the Jews
. . .” is an outright lie, a "silly story."
Once again, like everything else associated
with the “Holocaust,” the Wannsee Conference myth collapses when subjected to
even the most basic investigation.
Recommended Reading:
By Francis Dupont
Contents
Introduction
Participants and the Minutes
The Real Wannsee Protocols
Jewish Emigration and Evacuation to the
East
Wannsee Protocol Expressed Concern for
Jewish
Safety
No Jews over 65 to be Evacuated to the East
No Jewish World War I Veterans to be
Evacuated East
No Jews Working in “Vital Industries” to be
Evacuated
The Number of Jews under German Control
Identified Only 4.5 Million Jews Ever Under Direct
German Control
Category “B” Countries Excluded from German
Control
Russian Jews Flee Advancing Germans
Einsatzgruppen Exaggerations
4.5 Million Jews under Direct German
Control—Yet 4.3 Million Claim Compensation
Wannsee Protocol Details Forced Jewish
Labor
“Appropriate Action” Meant Sterilization
Conclusion—The Wannsee Conference Was a
Discussion about the Mechanics of Moving Certain Groups of Jews to the East,
and Never Mentioned Mass Murder in Any Form
Appendix A: The Wannsee Protocol: Full
English Translation
Appendix B: The Wannsee Protocol, Full
German Originals
Appendix C: Adolf Eichmann and the Wannsee
Protocol
Saturday, September 5, 2015
On the Uses of the Holocaust
In the very last section of The Six
Million: Fact or Fiction, I put forward the reasons why the Holocaust
Storytellers continue with the “gassed six million” fable, concluding that:
Finally, “the Holocaust” has served as a tool for those who seek to suppress any discussion of race, immigration, or ethnic issues.This last factor has led to, for example, any group which advocates the preservation of its national identity or homogeneity, being dismissed as “Nazi” and therefore “one step away from the gas chambers.”
The recent events surrounding the ongoing
flooding of Europe with “migrants” (and I use that word advisedly, because it
certainly seems that many of them are actually just opportunistic illegal
immigrants) have turned out to be a case in point—and have shown the accuracy
of my point.
According to an article that has now
appeared in the New York Times, we
find that a significant number of major Jewish organizations in the US have
announced that any European who is opposed to the current “migrant” flow is
only doing so because they are not “aware of the Holocaust.”
The New
York Times article (Humanitarian Crisis Evokes Europe’s Darkest Hour, Sept.4, 2015) goes on to tell us:
“It was horrifying when I saw those images of police putting numbers on people’s arms,” said Robert Frolich, the chief rabbi of Hungary. “It reminded me of Auschwitz. And then putting people on a train with armed guards to take them to a camp where they are closed in? Of course there are echoes of the Holocaust.”
Europeans are facing one of the Continent’s worst humanitarian crises since World War II, yet many seem blind to images that recall that blackest time in their history.
This migrant crisis is no genocide. The issue throughout the Continent is how to register, house, resettle or repatriate hundreds of thousands of migrants and refugees, a daunting logistical challenge. But perhaps not since the Jews were rounded up by Nazi Germany have there been as many images coming out of Europe of people locked into trains, babies handed over barbed wire, men in military gear herding large crowds of bedraggled men, women and children.
At the same time, the images may reveal a deeper truth about Europe and its seeming unpreparedness for a crisis so long in the making: While extolling the virtues of human rights and humanism, it remains, in many parts, a place resistant to immigration and diversity.
As a result, some here are reacting in ways that recall some of the Continent’s darkest impulses.
“They must be oblivious because who would
do that if they had any historical memory whatsoever,” said Kenneth Roth,
executive director of Human Rights Watch. “It’s amazing, really. Certainly
those images of the trains can’t help but conjure up nightmares of the
Holocaust.”
But for others, the fact that it was not done on purpose was even more frightening, showing a puzzling historical disconnect in many of the very places that the Holocaust caused the deepest devastation.
“It
may be correct that they didn’t know, but the insensitivity and the ignorance
of the imagery their actions evoked is stunning; it’s just sickening,” said
Jonathan Greenblatt, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, in New
York.
For many migrant advocates, what is so puzzling about this historical amnesia is that the countries taking the hardest line are among those that suffered the most during World War II and produced the most refugees in the war’s aftermath.
“It’s hard to understand how people lose
their sense of history so quickly,” said Andrew Stroehlein, European media
director for Human Rights Watch.
“We all say we have learned the lessons of
history, but to be turning away these desperate people who are fleeing a
horrific situation suggests that we haven’t learned the lessons at all.”
It should not be necessary for me to point
out that Kenneth Roth, Jonathan Greenblatt, and Andrew Stroehlein are all
Jewish.
So there you have it: if you don’t accept
the migrant flow, you are repeating the Holocaust—exactly the type of tactic I
pointed out in my book.
It is sad to see the tragedy of current
events in the Middle East and its results in Europe become the subject of yet
more “Holocaust” blackmail: and this
makes it even more imperative that the fable of the “six million” be squashed
once and for all.
غمگینانه است که تراژدی کنونی در خاور میانه و نتایج آن در اروپا تبدیل به سوژه برای باج گیری "هولوکاست" دیگری شود : و این باعث
ضرورت بیشتری میشود که داستان "شش میلیون"یک بار برای همیشه داغان
شود.
Ending the Debate on Auschwitz I’s “Gas Chamber”
وقتش رسیده که برای همیشه "بحث" احمقانه پیرامون ادعای .وجودی "اتاق گاز" در آشویتس را خاتمه دهیم
The time has come to end forever the silly
“debate” on the claimed existence of a “gas chamber” at Auschwitz I.
 |
| The alleged "gas chamber" at Auschwitz I, complete with fake "chimney," as shown to tourists. |
"اتاقهای گاز" در آشویتس با دودکشهای ساختگی/دروغین -که بعد از جنگ درست شده اند - صرفا برای نشان دادن به توریستها
 |
| The alleged "gas chamber" at Auschwitz I, photographed in 1945 after the German defeat, showing no "chimney." |
Let’s be absolutely clear about this: this
“gas chamber” — still the “main” tourist attraction in the entire Auschwitz
legend, through which literally millions of unsuspecting tourists have tramped —
is a post-war fabrication from start to finish.
Anyone who had any doubts about can do
themselves a favor and consult even the Holocaust Storytellers’ own accounts.
Take as one example a leading Holocaustian
Robert van Pelt, who wrote as follows in his book The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence from the Irving Trial as follows:
“With its chimney and its gas chamber, the crematorium functions as the solemn conclusion for tours through the camp. Visitors are not told that crematorium they see is largely a post-war reconstruction.
“When Auschwitz was transformed into a museum after the war, the decision was taken to concentrate the history of the whole complex in one of its component parts. The infamous crematoria where the mass murders had taken place were ruins in Birkenau, two miles away. The committee felt that a crematorium was required at the end of the memorial journey, and crematorium I was reconstructed to speak of the history of the incinerators at Birkenau. This program of usurpation was rather detailed. A chimney, the ultimate symbol of Birkenau, was re-created; four hatched openings in the roof, as if for pouring Zyklon-B into the gas chamber below, were installed, and two of the three furnaces were rebuilt using original parts. There are no signs to explain these restitutions, they were not marked at the time, and the guides remain silent about it when they take visitors through this building that is presumed by the tourist to be the place where it happened.” - Robert van Pelt, The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence from the Irving Trial, (Indiana University Press, 2002, ISBN 978-0253340160), page 121.
So there you have it, from the horse’s
mouth as it were.
Everything in the “gas chamber” at
Auschwitz I: the ovens, the unattached chimney, and the “Zyklon-B insertion
holes” in the ceiling are post-war additions. Everything.
Let’s
not even argue about this any further.
 |
| The fake "Zyklon B insertion holes" on the roof of the alleged "gas chamber" at Auschwitz I: Built in 1947, the camp museum and official Holocaust storytellers now admit. |
 |
| The "recreated" ovens in the alleged "gas chamber" building at Auschwitz I: another post-war (1947) addition, now admitted to by the camp museum and all official Holocaust storytellers. |
As a matter of interest, the Auschwitz
Museum has been steadily forced to retract its position on this “gas chamber”
over the years.
 |
| The official Auschwitz Camp Museum,website in 2006 admitted that the "chimney" and "two incinerators" had been added to the building after the war. |
Up to 2006, the official Auschwitz Museum
website claimed that this “gas chamber” was first used in the “autumn of 1941”
and was used to “kill thousands of newly arrived Jews, as well as several
groups of Soviet POWs.”
This continued, the 2006 Auschwitz Museum
website continued, until July 1943, when the “incinerators, chimney, and some
walls were dismantled and the holes in the roof, through which the SS men had
poured Zyklon B, were sealed.
“After the war, the Museum carried out a
partial reconstruction. The chimney and two incinerators were rebuilt using
original components, as were several openings in the gas chamber roof.”
So in fact, the official Auschwitz Museum
admitted as early as 2006 that the “gas chamber” had been rebuilt, although
they still continued to claim that it had actually been a gas chamber.
The growth of the internet served to
sabotage these claims, and by 2012, the Auschwitz Museum had updated its
website description of the Auschwitz I “gas chamber” as follows:
Gas Chamger[sic] and Crematory I.Soon after taking this picture the crematory chimney was recreated, one door was removed and the bricked window was uncovered. It was done to recreate the crematory exterior look.”
 |
| In 2012, the Auschwitz Camp Museum website admitted even more post-war "reconstructions" to the alleged "gas chamber" at Auschwitz I. |
Once again, the official Auschwitz Museum
website admitted that the building had been “recreated” and although
they still called it a “gas chamber” they were far less forthcoming about the
details and date of operation as they had been in 2006.
In 2015, the Auschwitz Museum website had
once again “updated” their page on Auschwitz I to completely remove any
reference to a “gas chamber,” although separate documentation they put out
still claims that it was used as an “experimental gas chamber.”
So, although
- The
Holocaust Storytellers freely admit that the “chimney, ovens, Zyklon B holes in
the roof, and doors” were all built in 1947; and
- The problems involved in using this room
as a “gas chamber” are obvious to anyone with a modicum of logic — for example,
it is located right in front of the main entrance, the camp hospital (!), and
in full view of the main road and the passing locals;
. .
. the Holocaust Storytellers still insist that it was used as a “gas chamber” .
. . One has to wonder just how stupid they think people are to believe their nonsense.
Friday, September 4, 2015
The Six Million: Fact or Fiction
This work is without doubt the single most
important revisionist overview of the legend of the “Six Million” Holocaust
ever yet published.
Just some of the amazing revelations in this
book include:
- How Zionists and Nazis cooperated before the
war on writing Germany’s racial laws—and in the setting up of Jewish
settlements in Palestine;
- How Zionists offered to take up arms for Nazi
Germany against Britain during World War II;
- How Nazi policy was first aimed at
encouraging Jews to emigrate, and then after the war broke out, to evacuating
them east of the Urals;
- How official German records shows that there
were 4.5 million Jews under Nazi control, and of that number, 4.3 million
lodged claims as “Holocaust victims” after the war;
- How the Soviet Union used torture to produce
the lion’s share of “confessions” extracted from Germans to support the
“extermination” allegations;
- How the Jewish lead prosecutor in the
“Einsatzgruppen” trials publicly admitted to having witnessed torture and
personally used death threats to extract “confessions”;
- Exactly what Adolf Eichmann Confessed to—and
what he did not;
- The shocking lies and distortions contained
in the two John Demjanjuk trials;
- How the Auschwitz Camp Museum has formally
admitted that the “gas chamber” it has shown to millions of tourists is
actually a fake;
- How original German architect plans of
Auschwitz show no “gas chambers”;
- How forensic chemical examination of
Auschwitz has disproved the use of Zyklon-B in the so-called “ruined gas
chambers”;
- How official Israeli and Polish university
archaeological digs at Belzec and Sobibór have failed to find any evidence of
“gas chambers”; and of how a similar dig at Chelmno directly contradicted
“eyewitness” testimony;
- How the “gas chambers” at Majdanek have glass
windows, baths, and real showers for the alleged “victims”;
- How the “carbon monoxide” gas bottles on
display at Majdanek, still connected to a “gas chamber,” are in fact engraved
and marked as “carbon dioxide!”;
- Details of the “Star of David gas chamber
tile” hoax at the 2013 Treblinka archaeological dig;
- How a delousing chamber at Dachau has been
misrepresented as a homicidal gas chamber;
- How German POWs were forced to alter a shower
room at Sachenhausen to support a Soviet show trial—but that the forgery was so
crude and embarrassing that the Communists knocked down the building in 1952.
- The Bergen-Belsen camp is also reviewed, along
with an explanation of the typhus epidemic which swept the camp in the last
months of the war and created the horror images of emaciated dead bodies now
associated with “the Holocaust.”
This new version also deals with the
“eyewitness survivor” memoirs and their outright lies and forgery, starting
with a superbly illustrated expose of the faked memoirs of “Nazi hunter” Simon
Wiesenthal and many others.
Finally, the last section discusses the
all-important question of how and why the Holocaust storytellers have gone
through so much trouble to make up the incredible story of the “Six Million.”
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
CHAPTER 1: NAZIS AND ZIONISTS BEFORE THE WAR
Section 1: Nazi Anti-Semitism and Jewish Emigration from Greater Germany 1933–1940
Section 2: Zionist and Nazi Collaboration on the 1935 Nuremberg Laws
Section 3: “A Nazi Travels to Palestine”—How the SS Supported the Zionist Colonization of Palestine
Section 4: Nazi Financial Assistance to Zionism: the “Haavara” Transfer Agreement
Section 5: The Jewish Declaration of War against Germany and the Organized Boycott of German Goods
Section 6: The Truth about Kristallnacht
Section 7: The Creation of the Concentration Camps
Section 8: Zionists Offered to Fight for the Nazis against the British
CHAPTER 2: THE NUMBER OF JEWS UNDER NAZI CONTROL
Section 9: There Were 4.5 Million Jews under Nazi Control
Section 10: 4.3 Million Postwar “Holocaust Claims” against German Government
Section 11: Yad Vashem’s “Victim List” Compiled on Hearsay
Section 12: Dieter Wisliceny and Wilhelm Höttl—The Spurious Origin of the “Six Million” Number
Section 13: Jewish Holocaust Scholar Raul Hilberg Reduces Total Death
Toll to 2.8 Million—but Media Still use the “Six Million Dead” Figure
Section 14: Auschwitz “Death Toll” Officially Reduced by 2.5 Million—but Media Still use the “Six Million Dead” Figure
Section 15: The Shrinking Number of Dead at Auschwitz: From 9 Million to 73,000
Section 16: The Korherr Report
CHAPTER 3: COMMONLY USED LIES AND DISTORTIONS
Section 17: The Outrageous Lies and Distortions of the “Kurt Gerstein Statement”
Section 18: Jewish Scholars and Yad Vashem Forced to Deny “Soap,” “Lampshades” Horror Stories
Section 19: What Was Really Said at the Wannsee Conference
Section 20: What the “Final Solution” Actually Meant: Deportation to the East
Section 21: Hitler’s 1939 Reichstag “Threat to the Jews” Speech
Section 22: What Hitler Said about the “Extermination” Rumors
Section 23: Himmler’s 1943 Posen Speech and the Meaning of “Ausrotten”
Section 24: Himmler’s Personal Correspondence Never Mentions “Extermination” Claims
Section 25: The Bad Arolsen “International Tracing Service” Archives Provides No Evidence of any Mass Murder Program
CHAPTER 4: THE NUREMBERG WAR CRIMES TRIALS
Section 26: The Legally-Flawed Nuremberg “War Crimes Trials” Did Not “Prove” the Holocaust
Section 27: The Katyn Massacre—How the Soviets Tortured Nazis to “Obtain Confessions”
Section 28: Official “Holocaust” Journal Admits Soviet Torture used to Obtain Nazi “Confessions”
CHAPTER 5: THE EINSATZGRUPPEN—MYTH AND REALITY
Section 29: Anti-Partisan Warfare—The Real Purpose of the Einsatzgruppen (“Task Forces”)
Section 30: Benjamin Ferencz, Jewish Chief Prosecutor at the
Einsatzgruppen Trials, Admits to Using Forced Confessions and Death
Threats
Section 31: The Einsatzgruppen Ereignismeldungen (“Event Reports”)
Section 32: The Babi Yar Massacre in Kiev: Wartime Aerial Photography Exposes the Lie
Section 33: The “Confession”—and Retraction—of Einsatzgruppen Commander Otto Ohlendorf
Section 34: The Wildly Varying Numbers of Einsatzgruppen “Victims”
Section 35: The Oswald Pohl “Confessions”—Textbook Example of the Nuremberg Miscarriage of Justice
Section 36: The Perjured Testimony of Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski
CHAPTER 6: THE ADOLF EICHMANN TRIAL
Section 37: Eichmann Only Admitted Deporting Jews, Never Murdering Them
Section 38: Eichmann’s Doctored “Memoirs”
CHAPTER 7: THE JOHN DEMJANJUK TRIALS
Section 39: John Demjanjuk—Acquitted in Israel!
Section 40: “Survivor” Testimony Identifies Demjanjuk—But Israeli Supreme Court Dismisses them as Liars
Section 41: German Court Ignores Israeli Decision
CHAPTER 8: THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CONFESSIONS
Section 42: Why Would Anyone “Confess?”
Section 43: The Suchomel “Confession” in Claude Lanzmann’s “Shoah” Movie
CHAPTER 9: “DEATH CAMPS” VERSUS “LABOR CAMPS”
Section 44: The Distribution of the Concentration Camps
CHAPTER 10: AUSCHWITZ-BIRKENAU
Section 45: Auschwitz Founded as a POW Camp for Polish Soldiers in 1940
Section 46: Auschwitz “Gas Chamber” Shown to Tourists Is Officially Admitted to be Fake
Section 47: Auschwitz Museum Finally Admits that “Gas Chamber” Was Built After the War
Section 48: Auschwitz II: Architect’s Plans Show No “Gas Chambers”
Section 49: Real Showers in Auschwitz and the “Gas through the Shower-head” Legend
Section 50: Steam Disinfection Stations for Prisoner Clothing as Part of the Anti-Typhus Measures
Section 51: Delousing Chambers for Clothing Used Zyklon-B in All Camps
Section 52: The Real Auschwitz Gas Chambers—The “Kanada I” Delousing Chambers Which Used Zyklon-B
Section 53: Photographs of Auschwitz’s Kanada I and Its Clothing Delousing Installation Gas Chamber in Action
Section 54: Forensic Investigation of “Gas Chamber” Ruins Reveals No Evidence of Gassings
Section 55: The Rudolf Report Confirms the Lack of Forensic Evidence
Section 56: The Auschwitz “Gas Chambers” Change Location
Section 57: Auschwitz’s Real Purpose: A Massive Labor Camp
Section 58: Photographs of Auschwitz Inmates Belie Mass Gassing Allegations
Section 59: The Rudolf Höss Memoirs
Section 60: The Auschwitz Swimming Pool
Section 61: The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial of 1963
CHAPTER 11: THE AKTION REINHARD CAMPS
Section 62: Details Unknown for Decades
Section 63: The Höfle Telegram
Section 64: Problems with “Gassing by Diesel”
Section 65: The Purpose of the Reinhard Camps
CHAPTER 12: CHELMNO AND “GAS VANS”
Section 66: Chelmno—“Operational” for Eighteen Months
Section 67: Yad Vashem’s Gas Van That Wasn’t
Section 68: Walter Rauff and the “Gas Van” Story
Section 69: Forensic Digs Contradict “Official History” by Finding “Crematoria” in Chelmno
Section 70: The Chelmno Trials
CHAPTER 13: BELZEC
Section 71: The Belzec Camp—Given Little Prominence Because of Unbelievable Allegations
Section 72: Belzec’s Incredible Execution Methods: Electrocution and Drowning in Excrement
Section 73: The Belzec Trial
Section 74: Forensic Digs at Belzec Contradict “Official” History and Fail to Find “Gas Chambers”
CHAPTER 14: SOBIBÓR
Section 75: Sobibór—A Temporary Camp Which Only Existed for 15 Months
Section 76: Chlorine and Electricity: “Survivors” Claim Bizarre Execution Methods in Sobibór
Section 77: Yitzhak Arad’s Contradictory Official History of Sobibór
Section 78: Official Documents Show Sobibór’s True Function
Section 79: The Sobibór Trials
Section 80: Archaeological Digs Fail To Find Sobibór “Gas Chamber”
Section 81: 2014 Archaeological Dig Contradicts Earlier “Gas Chamber” Claims
CHAPTER 15: TREBLINKA
Section 82: Treblinka— Another Temporary Camp Which Only Existed for 15 Months
Section 83: Treblinka I and II—Labor Camp and Transit Area
Section 84: The Famous “Black Book of Polish Jewry” Claims Execution by “Steam” in Treblinka
Section 85: “Survivors” Claim Execution by “Vacuum Chambers”
Section 86: First 1999 Forensic Examination of Treblinka Site Reveals No Mass Graves
Section 87: US National Archive Aerial Photography of Treblinka Shows No Sign of “Extermination Camp”
Section 88: The 2010 Second Forensic Analysis of Treblinka Reveals No “Mass Graves”
Section 89: The 2013 Third Forensic Analysis of Treblinka and the “Star of David Gas Chamber Tiles” Hoax
Section 90: The “Evidence” of “Treblinka Guard” Paval Leleko
Section 91: The Franz Stangl Trial and His “Memoirs”
CHAPTER 16: MAJDANEK
Section 92: Majdanek, Lublin—Originally Built as POW Camp for Soviet Army Prisoners
Section 93: First Majdanek Soviet Show Trial, November 1944
Section 94: Number of Madjanek “Victims” Varies Wildly from 1.7 Million to 79,000
Section 95: “Gas Chamber” Added to Postwar Rebuilt Madjanek Crematorium Building
Section 96: The Impossibility of the Majdanek “Gas Chambers”
Section 97: Majdanek’s Real Showers for “Gassing Victims”
Section 98: Majdanek’s “Gas Bottles” on Display are Carbon Dioxide, Not Carbon Monoxide
Section 99: The Anomalies of Majdanek’s Second and Third “Gas Chambers”
Section 100: The Plain Glass Window in Majdanek’s Fourth “Gas Chamber”
Section 101: The Operation “Harvest Festival” Hoax
Section 102: The Mußfeldt “Confession”
Section 103: The Second Madjanek Trial of 1975
CHAPTER 17: DACHAU
Section 104: Dachau and Its Mysterious “Gas Chamber”
Section 105: The Real Dachau Gas Chambers—Delousing Cubicles
Section 106: Dachau Casualty Figures Officially “Reduced” from 238,000 to 20,000
CHAPTER 18: SACHSENHAUSEN
Section 107: Sachsenhausen: Gas Chamber Built in November 1945, Knocked Down in 1952
CHAPTER 19: BERGEN-BELSEN
Section 108: Typhus Deaths—Origin of Horror Images in Bergen-Belsen—No Gas Chambers
CHAPTER 20: “EYEWITNESS” ACCOUNTS
Section 109: Simon Wiesenthal’s Faked “Holocaust Memoirs”
Section 110: The Diary of Anne Frank—Father Admits “Transcribing” to “Explain” Ball Point Pen Use
Section 111: Rudolf Vrba’s “I Cannot Forgive”
Section 112: Olga Lengyel’s “Five Chimneys”
Section 113: Kitty Hart’s “Return to Auschwitz”
Section 114: Martin Gray’s “For Those I Loved”
Section 115: Jean Francis Steiner’s “Treblinka”
Section 116: Miklos Nyiszli’s “Auschwitz: A Doctor’s Eyewitness Account”
Section 117: Filip Müller’s “Eyewitness Auschwitz: Three Years in the Gas Chambers”
Section 118: Truthful Survivor Books Not Given Prominence
Section 119: Paul Rassinier—The Holocaust Victim Who Argued Against the “Gas Chambers”
Section 120: Martin Gilbert’s “Auschwitz and the Allies”
CHAPTER 21: OUTLANDISH HOLOCAUST CLAIMS
Section 121: Bears and Eagles
in Cages Eating Jews; Jewish “Soap Burial” in Atlanta, USA; Sausages
Made out of Jews; Mummified Thumbs as Light Switches; “Pedal-driven
Brain-bashing Machines”—And More, All in Nuremberg Court as “Evidence.”
CHAPTER 22: CONCLUSION
Section 122: The “Holocaust”—What Actually Happened
Section 123: Why Was the Holocaust Story Invented?
Appendix 1: Alois Brunner and the “I Would Do It All Again” Lie
Appendix 2: Deceit, Lies and Swindles: The Psychology behind “Holocaust Survivor Testimonies”
Appendix 3: The Ongoing “Survivor” Financial Swindles
Appendix 4: The Oskar Groening “I Saw the Gas Chambers” Story
Appendix 5: Auschwitz—Reality versus the Claims
No comments:
Post a Comment